You are currently viewing Monitoring opioid and benzodiazepine use and abuse: Is oral fluid or urine the preferred specimen type?
A rolled newspaper - the left side facing forward. The name of the newspaper is "News" and the words "News" and "Events" are below that. The rubber band keeping the newspaper rolled together is thick and white. There is smaller writing on the newspaper which cannot be read.

Monitoring opioid and benzodiazepine use and abuse: Is oral fluid or urine the preferred specimen type?

Abstract
Oral fluid (OF) has become an increasingly popular matrix to assess compliance in pain management and addiction settings as it reduces the likelihood of adulteration. However, drug concentrations and windows of detection are not as well studied in OF as in urine (UR). We compared the clinical utility and analytical performance of OF and UR as matrices for detecting common benzodiazepines and opioids.

OF and UR concentrations of 5 benzodiazepines and 7 opioids were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in 263 paired OF and UR specimens. UR creatinine was measured and prescription medications were reviewed.
The benzodiazepines 7-aminoclonazepam, lorazepam, and oxazepam exhibited statistically higher detection rates in UR. For opioids, 6-AM was statistically more likely to be detected in OF, while hydromorphone and oxymorphone were statistically more likely to be detected in UR. Chemical properties including glucuronidation explain preferential detection in each matrix, not UR creatinine nor prescription status.